The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined a chance to strike a blow to the legal shield protecting Big Tech in a case against Reddit over child pornography allegations.
The parents of the children had asked the Supreme Court to weigh Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally gives social media platforms immunity from litigation based on what third parties post online.
“Child pornography is the root cause of much of the sex trafficking that occurs in the world today, and it is primarily traded on the internet, through websites that claim immunity from suit under the Communications Decency Act,” they argued in court papers. “The parents said a 2018 law — the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act/Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act — is an exception to the protection given tounder Section 230.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and ruled the internet platform has to be held liable for its own conduct — not that of users.But on Tuesday, the justices declined to do so without comment. It would have taken four justices to hear the case.In its court filing, the company argued the victims wanted the platform held liable for conduct it should have known about.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case from a victim of sex trafficking who sought to hold Reddit, an online platform, responsible for hosting images of child pornography on the website.
Consulte Mais informação »
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear bid to sue Reddit over child pornThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a bid by child pornography victims to overcome a legal shield for internet companies in a case involving a lawsuit accusing Reddit Inc of violating federal law by failing to rid the discussion website of this illegal content.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court Turns Down Lawsuit Blaming Reddit for Child PornA former minor and parents of minors joined forces to sue Reddit in a California federal court in 2021, accusing Reddit of failing to remove sexually exploitative content and profiting off the posts.
Consulte Mais informação »
Gorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court last week tersely dismissed an immigration-related case, known as Arizona v. Mayorkas, because the matter was moot.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsThis narrow interpretation of the Clean Water Act limits what qualifies as 'waters of the United States.'
Consulte Mais informação »