The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a bid by child pornography victims to overcome a legal shield for internet companies in a case involving a lawsuit accusing Reddit Inc of violating federal law by failing to rid the discussion website of this illegal content.
The justices turned away the appeal of a lower court's decision to dismiss the proposed class action lawsuit on the grounds that Reddit was shielded by a U.S. statute called Section 230, which safeguards internet companies from lawsuits for content posted by users but has an exception for claims involving child sex trafficking.an opportunity to narrow the scope of Section 230 immunity in a separate case.
Reddit allows users to post content that is moderated by other users in forums called subreddits. The case centers on sexually explicit images and videos of children posted to such forums by users. The plaintiffs - the parents of minors and a former minor who were the subjects of the images - sued Reddit in 2021 in federal court in California, seeking monetary damages.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 concluded that in order for the exception under FOSTA to apply, plaintiffs must show that an internet company "knowingly benefited" from the sex trafficking through its own conduct. Reddit said in court papers that it works hard to find and prevent the sharing of child sexual exploitation materials on its platform, giving all users the ability to flag posts and using dedicated teams to remove illegal content.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case from a victim of sex trafficking who sought to hold Reddit, an online platform, responsible for hosting images of child pornography on the website.
Consulte Mais informação »
Gorsuch serves as conscience of the U.S. Supreme CourtThe United States Supreme Court last week tersely dismissed an immigration-related case, known as Arizona v. Mayorkas, because the matter was moot.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court “Sackett” Decision Shrinks Protections for US WetlandsThis narrow interpretation of the Clean Water Act limits what qualifies as 'waters of the United States.'
Consulte Mais informação »
Biden’s student debt plan hangs in balance as major Supreme Court rulings loomThe legal fight over President Biden’s plan to forgive billions of dollars of student debt is one of the biggest cases on which the Supreme Court will rule in the next month.
Consulte Mais informação »