The Supreme Court struck down affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina Thursday, ruling that both institutions violated the 14th Amendment as well as f…
If you want to know why a transgender media influencer in a bubble bath appears in a Bud Light ad; why big companies shell out money for radical, Marxist charities like Black Lives Matter; or why de-facto racial hiring quotas exist under the euphemism of “diversity,” you need to know something about the business of “DEI.
The Supreme Court struck down affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina Thursday, ruling that both institutions violated the 14th Amendment as well as federal civil rights law.As I reported weeks ago, C-suite lawyers were closely monitoring a case before SCOTUS on whether race could be used in college admissions.
The Supremes ruled on admission policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, specifically.Sorry, my sources who advise corporations on governance issues say the Supremes actually did rule on DEI since corporate DEI is based on some of the same noxious and now unconstitutional premises that colleges have used to justify race-based admissions.
Race wasn’t really a so-called “plus” factor in deciding admission that past court precedents mandated. The university racial bean counters actually used their race against them — a “minus” factor — to achieve their diversity goals.put it this way: “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it. . . . The student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race. Many universities have for too long done just the opposite.”
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act specifically involves employment for companies with more than 15 employees.Title VII is virtually indistinguishable from Title VI, they say.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Fashion School Leaders Express Concern Over Supreme Court Affirmative Action DecisionThe U.S. Supreme Court decision Thursday to establish new limits on affirmative action programs, essentially ending the consideration of race in college admissions, caused concern among fashion design school leaders.
Consulte Mais informação »
FREE FOR ALL: SCOTUS to decide fate of student loan handout, shipping giant strike 'imminent' and more top headlinesFOX NEWS FIRST: SCOTUS to decide fate of student loan handout, shipping giant strike 'imminent' and more top headlines
Consulte Mais informação »
SCOTUS ruling prompts fear, criticism from LGBTQ community leadersLGBTQ+ advocates, and the dissenting Supreme Court judges, fear the recent Supreme Court ruling on free speech has opened the door to encourage discrimination.
Consulte Mais informação »
Friendly Fire: The governor’s sexist lawyer, the abortion rights vote, and turmoil in RussiaSCOTUS gets one right: Election deniers shouldn’t be put in charge of counting votes.
Consulte Mais informação »
Anti-LGBTQ Petitioners Apparently Made Up Gay Couple Cited in Major SCOTUS CaseA wedding website designer, whose case the Supreme Court will rule upon this week, has apparently made up the gay couple who supposedly requested a website. She has also never once made a wedding website.
Consulte Mais informação »
Chicago's academic institutions wrestle with SCOTUS affirmative action rulingChicago's academic institutions must now wrestle with the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling striking down affirmative action.
Consulte Mais informação »