The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a bid by President Joe Biden's administration to revive a federal law that makes it a criminal offense to encourage illegal immigration after it was struck down by a lower court as a violation of free speech rights.
The justices took up the administration's appeal of a February ruling by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidating the law for infringing on rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
The 9th Circuit's ruling threw out part of the conviction of a California man, Helaman Hansen, who had been prosecuted under the law.The federal government accused Hansen of deceiving undocumented immigrants between 2012 and 2016 by promising them that they could gain U.S. citizenship through an "adult adoption" program operated by his Sacramento-based business, Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce.
The government said Hansen persuaded at least 471 people to join his program, charging them each up to $10,000 even though he "knew that the adult adoptions that he touted would not lead to U.S. citizenship." Hansen was convicted in 2017 of violating provisions of the federal law that bars inducing or encouraging noncitizens "to come to, enter, or reside" in the United States illegally, as well as mail fraud and wire fraud and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
On appeal, the 9th Circuit in February ruled that the encouragement law is unconstitutional because it is overly broad and criminalizes even commonplace speech that is protected by the First Amendment, such as telling undocumented immigrants, "I encourage you to reside in the United States," or advising them about available social services.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court weighs controversial election-law caseIf adopted the so-called independent state legislature theory would give state legislatures the power to put in place all manner of election laws and rules, without any review by the state courts.
Consulte Mais informação »
Op-Ed: The ominous way the Supreme Court could change our electionsIf the Supreme Court were to accept the independent state legislature theory, then no court could invalidate partisan gerrymandering.
Consulte Mais informação »
Biden admin tells Supreme Court law protecting social media companies has limitsThe Biden administration argued to the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday that social media giants like Google could in some instances have responsibility for user content, adopting a stance that could potentially undermine a federal law shielding companies from liability.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court hears arguments for 'independent state legislature' theory caseThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments for a case brought by North Carolina Republicans involving the 'independent state legislature' theory that challenges the ability of state courts to strike down certain laws made by state legislatures. NBC's Julia Ainsley reports.
Consulte Mais informação »
Americans must rely on Supreme Court to save traditional views on marriageAmericans must rely on the Supreme Court to save traditional views on marriage. Congress’s new Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t respect people of faith.
Consulte Mais informação »
What each Supreme Court Justice has said about gay marriageWhile the Supreme Court discusses 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, Newsweek looks at how each judge stands on same-sex marriage.
Consulte Mais informação »