The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday took no action on appeals seeking to revive two...
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday took no action on appeals seeking to revive two restrictive Republican-backed abortion laws from Indiana, even as debate rages over a new measure in Alabama that would prohibit the procedure almost entirely.
If the nine-justice court takes up either case, it would give the conservative majority an opportunity to chip away at the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide and recognized a right under the U.S. Constitution for women to terminate pregnancies. The Alabama law was signed by Republican Governor Kay Ivey last week but is not set to go into effect for six months. It would outlaw almost all abortions, including in cases of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. Exceptions would be allowed only to protect the mother’s health. Doctors who perform abortions could face up to 99 years in prison.
Their chances of success were given a boost last year by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had backed abortion rights in two key cases. Kennedy was replaced by President Donald Trump’s conservative appointee Brett Kavanaugh, who has a thin record on abortion.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Alabama anti-abortion bill takes aim at Supreme CourtThe Alabama state Senate on Tuesday approved a bill that could become the nation's strictest abortion law. It would make it a felony for a doctor to perform or attempt an abortion during any stage of pregnancy.
Consulte Mais informação »
After Alabama: Abortion cases up for Supreme Court reviewAlabama state Sen. Vivian Davis Figures asked a GOP senator why he wouldn't want Alabama's new abortion bill to include exceptions for victims of rape or incest 👇
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court’s conservatives overturn precedent as liberals ask ‘which cases the court will overrule next’Justice Clarence Thomas said overruling a 40-year precedent is justified because it wrongly interpreted the Constitution.
Consulte Mais informação »
With abortion cases looming, Breyer warns Supreme Court may overturn major precedentNBC’s Pete Williams joins MTP Daily to discuss Supreme Court Justice Breyer appearing to issue a warning to his colleagues about Roe v. Wade, as several states move to enact abortion restricting legislation.
Consulte Mais informação »
11 Supreme Court cases with imminent decisionsAfter months of hearing oral arguments in dozens of cases, the Supreme Court justices convene on Mondays in May and June to release their final opinions of the term.
Consulte Mais informação »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Iraqi man's torture-related deportation challengeThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid to avoid deportation by a Christ...
Consulte Mais informação »
If Donald Trump gets another Supreme Court pick...Conservatives may not love everything about Donald Trump, but his record of installing federal judges has delighted them
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court deals Apple major setback in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court is allowing iPhone users to move forward with their lawsuit against Apple. The suit argues Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store is an unfair use of monopoly power.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court Shows It's Ready To Overrule Precedent, Dissent Sounds Alarm In California V. HyattThe U.S. Supreme Court shows it’s ready to overrule precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt. Will Roe v. Wade be next?
Consulte Mais informação »
Justice Breyer's warning and other things we learned at the Supreme Court MondayCNN News, delivered. Select from our newsletters below and enter your email to subscribe.
Consulte Mais informação »