Trump envoy won't ruling out using Afghan war law to justify Iranian strikes
The State Department’s top official on Iran declined Wednesday to rule out the possibility that the Trump administration might justify a military confrontation with Tehran using the 2001 law that authorized the Afghanistan war.
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. poster="http://v.politico.com/images/1155968404/201906/1887/1155968404_6048022275001_6048027772001-vs.jpg?pubId=1155968404"Hook did not rule out the possibility of a war with Iran, although he at one point said that as far as the U.S. is thinking now, “There is no talk of offensive action. It’s a defensive move.”
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Trump calls alleged Iranian tanker attacks 'very minor'President Donald Trump downplayed the seriousness of suspected attacks on two merchant tankers in the Gulf of Oman last week.
Consulte Mais informação »
'Every hero becomes a bore at last'Analysis: Hillary Rodham Clinton could not stop him, and Robert Mueller so far has landed something less than a fatal blow. So the task of defeating Trump in 2020 may now fall to Ralph Waldo Emerson
Consulte Mais informação »
'Not Donald Trump': Orlando paper announces its endorsement for president hours before Trump launches 2020 campaign'We'd even consider backing Trump if, say, he found the proverbial cure for cancer or—about as likely—changed the essence of who he is (he won't),' the article said.
Consulte Mais informação »
'Trump Baby' will greet Donald Trump at Orlando rally 'to tell Trump how many people hate him'The Trump Baby balloon will be one of several replicas made in the U.S., the British team behind the original blimp say.
Consulte Mais informação »
What Trump Can Learn From Reagan About War With IranAnalysis: Reagan’s careful, swift response to Iranian tanker attacks in the 1980s offers a model to Trump for avoiding a catastrophic conflict
Consulte Mais informação »