Former President Donald Trump rejects the proposed protective order by special counsel Jack Smith, arguing that it would infringe upon his freedom of speech. Trump suggests that Smith should be bound by a protective order instead, citing alleged illegal leaks by prosecutors.
Trump proposed in a statement on his social media platform Truth Social that Smith, instead, follow a protective order himself because prosecutors were"illegally 'leaking' all over the place," he said.Prosecutors on Friday night had filed a proposed protective order, which would govern the way discovery is managed in cases said to involve certain non-public information.
The prosecutors argued they needed the protective order because the former president was a risk. He might share any discovery he and his defense team received, which"could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case," they wrote. He said through a statement released by his campaign on Friday that the Truth Social post in question was the"definition of political speech."
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Trump team ordered to respond to Special Counsel Jack Smith's protective order filingFormer President Trump's legal team is being ordered to respond to a protective order request from Special Counsel Jack Smith by Monday.
Consulte Mais informação »
Truth Social Post Prompts Jack Smith to Ask Judge to Prevent Trump from Releasing Discovery EvidenceSpecial Counsel Jack Smith on Friday asked a judge to issue a protective order in the case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election after Trump made a post on Truth Social.
Consulte Mais informação »
What Jack Smith actually wants protected in citing Trump’s threatening postProsecutors seek to prevent the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials in the 2020 election case. Jack Smith's team cites Trump's threatening post, emphasizing the importance of the proposed order in protecting witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.
Consulte Mais informação »
Justice Department requests protective order in Trump election interference case to limit his public commentsThe Justice Department has asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.
Consulte Mais informação »
Prosecutors ask judge to issue protective order after Trump post appearing to promise revengeThe Justice Department has asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him. Prosecutors on Friday requested that U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan issue a protective order concerning evidence in the case, a day after Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and block the peaceful transition of power. The order, different from a “gag order,” would limit what information Trump and his legal team could share publicly about the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
Consulte Mais informação »
Judge skeptical of constitutionality of grand jury in Trump classified documents case in FloridaA federal judge pressed special counsel Jack Smith on Monday to explain why he used a D.C. grand jury to investigate the Florida-based case against former President Donald Trump for mishandling of classified documents.
Consulte Mais informação »