The Supreme Court will hear a major new case that could further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act, enacted to protect minority voters, as the justices consider a dispute over Alabama's congressional district map.
Alabama’s Republican attorney general, Steve Marshall, is asking the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, to unravel decades of precedent on how to remedy concerns that the power of Black voters is being diluted by dividing voters into districts where white voters dominate.
For the first time in the court's history, two Black justices — conservative Clarence Thomas and liberal Ketanji Brown Jackson — will be on the bench together for a case concerning race issues.The two consolidated cases being heard Tuesday arise from litigation over the new congressional district map that was drawn by the Republican-controlled Alabama Legislature after the 2020 census.
The state argues that the lower court put too much emphasis on race in reaching its conclusions. Marshall says in court papers that the fact that the challengers were able to show that it was possible to draw a second majority-Black district was not sufficient evidence that the state's actions were discriminatory.
The Supreme Court has in two cases over the last decade already weakened the Voting Rights Act, beginning in 2013 when it gutted a key provision of the law that allowed for federal oversight of election law changes in certain states. Last year,Lawyers for the challengers say the lower court followed existing precedent, something that Roberts noted when he voted against blocking the decision.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court takes up key voting rights case from AlabamaWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is taking up an Alabama redistricting case that could have far-reaching effects on minority voting power across the United States.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court back in session Monday with new justice and top casesAlready the court has said it will decide cases on a range of major issues including affirmative action, voting rights and the rights of LGBTQ people.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court to take up Alabama racial gerrymandering caseOpponents of the election map say it does not provide proportional representation to minorities, making the map a violation of the Voting Rights Act
Consulte Mais informação »
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Lawsuit over Alabama's Congressional District Lines - Alabama NewsTuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a lawsuit over Alabama's congressional district map, which sets up a new test of the Voting Rights Act.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court to take up Alabama racial gerrymandering caseOpponents of the election map say it does not provide proportional representation to minorities, making the map a violation of the Voting Rights Act
Consulte Mais informação »
Nevada county's plans to hand-count early ballots challengedA rural county in Nevada where conspiracy theories about voting machines run deep is planning to start hand-counting its mail-in ballots two weeks before Election Day, a process that risks public release of early voting results. Several voting and civil rights groups said Monday they objected to the proposal and will consider legal action if Nye County pushes ahead with its plan. Nevada is one of 10 states that allow local election offices to begin tabulating ballots before Election Day, but the machines that typically do that are programmed not to release results.
Consulte Mais informação »