The American Humanist Association is challenging the existence of a 40-foot cross on government-owned land, but the Trump administration hopes a newly conservative majority on the Supreme Court will agree to let it stand.
This case offers the opportunity for a newly constituted conservative court majority to draw a new, more religion-friendly line.
The American Legion and the Trump administration are urging the court to declare government support for religious symbols or religious programs constitutional unless a religious minority has been coerced to believe something that violates its principles. That would significantly broaden the standard used until now. But the Legion and the Trump administration contend that unless a government action tangibly harms a religious minority, it is constitutional.
Others, like Monica Miller, an attorney for the American Humanist Association, see its meaning as plain and obvious as the cross is large. "It's a giant 40-foot Latin cross," she said."There's no other meaning to the Latin cross other than Christianity." Still, the odds are the court will allow the cross to stand. The question is, in its decision expected by summer, what the court's opinion will say about how to judge the standard for religious symbols and programs in the future.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court to decide fate of cross-shaped WWI memorial in MarylandThe Supreme Court hears arguments on whether a 40-foot Bladensburg, Maryland, cross-shaped war memorial violates the First Amendment. Should it be taken down?
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court to decide if giant cross is religious symbol or secular memorial to war deadThe case raises a question that has vexed the justices for decades: What is the proper place for religion in American public life?
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court will look at whether a cross is promotion of religion or war memorialThe Supreme Court, long divided on the role of religion, is set to decide whether a 40-foot Latin cross in Maryland is an unconstitutional official endorsement of Christianity or a historic memorial for local soldiers who died in World War I.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court to decide fate of WWI memorial cross in church and state disputeThe fate of a 40-foot-tall cross built almost a century ago to honor World War I veterans is at the center of a separation of church and state dispute at the Supreme Court
Consulte Mais informação »
In major religion case, Supreme Court weighs Maryland cross disputeThe conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday takes up one of the bi...
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh took in WCAC basketball title games in D.C.Kavanaugh, who coaches his daughters' basketball teams, watched the St. John's girls defeat McNamara for their third straight WCAC championship.
Consulte Mais informação »
The tech industry is begging the Supreme Court to overturn Oracle's lawsuit against GoogleOver a dozen briefs have been filed asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on Oracle's long-standing lawsuit against Google.
Consulte Mais informação »
Progressive activists push 2020 Dems to pack Supreme CourtProgressive activists are pushing 2020 Democratic presidential candidates to commit to expanding the number of Supreme Court justices in order to dilute to current conservative majority
Consulte Mais informação »
Judges ‘are appointed for life, not for eternity,’ Supreme Court rulesJustices say that a deceased judge’s vote shouldn’t have been counted in 9th Circuit ruling.
Consulte Mais informação »
‘Appointed for Life, Not for Eternity’: Supreme Court Voids Deceased Judge’s VoteThe Supreme Court on Monday threw out a 2018 opinion on a gender-pay dispute because it was written by a federal appeals judge who had died a couple of weeks before the court announced its decision.
Consulte Mais informação »