The Federal Communications Commission's attempt to reinstate the internet policy known as net neutrality faces a major stumbling block in the form of Supreme Court scrutiny, according to some of its critics.
Under Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, the FCC released a new proposal on Thursday that would recategorize internet service providers under Title II of the Communications Act. This change would place them under additional regulations to ensure the ISPs do not discriminate or throttle content from various websites.
Verrilli and Gershengorn's arguments gained the attention of FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, a Republican who opposes the agency using its power to reclassify ISPs. Net neutrality advocates noted that the Verrilli-Gershengorn white paper was backed by USTelecom and the Internet and Television Association, two telecommunications industry lobbying groups. The two lobbying groups also assisted in funding a campaign to paint ex-FCC nominee and public advocate Gigi Sohn negatively over her support of net neutrality.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Texas Supreme Court Rules To Return Whistleblowers Lawsuit To Travis County District CourtOn Friday, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that a whistleblower lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton could return to trial in Travis County District Court. This comes days after four former top deputies of the attorney general’s office, Blake Brickman, Ryan Vassar, Mark Penley and David Maxwell, filed a...
Consulte Mais informação »
Inside the Biden FCC rationale for reinstating net neutrality nowThe Federal Communications Commission moved this past week to reinstate 'net neutrality,' a legal principle requiring that internet service providers treat all data equally and not discriminate based on their source or destination.
Consulte Mais informação »
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution
Consulte Mais informação »
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
Consulte Mais informação »
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
Consulte Mais informação »
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the ConstitutionThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
Consulte Mais informação »