The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether people can sue public officials who block them on social media
The court took up two separate cases involving much-lower-profile figures — two members of the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees in southern California and the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan. But the legal dispute is the same: Can blocking someone on social media give rise to a free speech violation under the Constitution’s First Amendment?
In the California case, board members Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane in 2017 blocked Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, parents of students in the school district, from commenting on their Facebook pages, and in the case of O’Connor-Ratcliff, responded to her Twitter posts. Zane has since left office.
The Michigan case arose in March 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic broke out. City Manager James Freed posted information on his Facebook page, which described him as a “public figure,” about efforts the city was taking to deal with the public health crisis. Freed says the Facebook page, which is no longer active, was a personal page. He used it to share pictures of his family and comment on his daily activities, he added.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court will rule against Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, legal experts predictUnfortunately for borrowers, legal experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court will greenlight President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan.
Consulte Mais informação »
California Supreme Court rejects lawsuit challenging Newsom's plan to treat mental illnessGov. Gavin Newsom's CARE Court plan to address severe mental illness, substance use and homelessness is on track to move forward after the high court rejected a legal challenge.
Consulte Mais informação »
What's next for abortion pill after Supreme Court's actionNothing will change for now. That's what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill.
Consulte Mais informação »
What’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s actionNothing will change for now. That’s what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill. A court case that began in Texas has sought to roll back Food and D…
Consulte Mais informação »
Democrats breathe temporary sigh of relief after Supreme Court order on abortion pillDemocrats express cautious optimism and Republicans voice frustration after the Supreme Court's decision to allow the abortion pill mifepristone to remain widely available.
Consulte Mais informação »
AOC Rebukes Alito 'Tantrum' and\u00a0 'Highly Politicized' Supreme Court'In our system of checks and balances, SCOTUS’s reckless behavior warrants a check from the legislative and executive branches,' says AOC. This is not unprecedented, it's how our system is designed to avert tyranny.'
Consulte Mais informação »