In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said Texas and Louisiana don't have legal standing to challenge deportation priorities.
In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said Texas and Louisiana don’t have legal standing to challenge deportation priorities.
It’s the second decision in eight days in which the Supreme Court has rejected lawsuits from Texas on standing grounds. Last week, the courtto challenge a federal law that gives preferences to Native American families in the adoptions of Native children. “This Court has consistently recognized that federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions,” Kavanaugh wrote, in an opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberals.
Kavanaugh described the decision in the case as “narrow,” and said it would not automatically apply to federal government policies outside the area of arrest and prosecution, where the executive branch has traditionally been granted broad discretion.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit immigration arrests, ruling against statesThe court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that brought the suit, lacked standing to challenge the administration's guidelines.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court rejects GOP states' challenge to Biden's deportation policyThe Supreme Court rejects Texas and Louisiana’s challenge to the Biden administration’s immigration guidelines that prioritize which noncitizens to deport
Consulte Mais informação »
PolitiFact - Why doesn’t the Supreme Court have a formal code of ethics?Federal laws, some of which were recently tightened, require Supreme Court justices to report gifts valued at more than a few hundred dollars. But there are no official ethics standards for the Supreme Court as there are for lower courts.
Consulte Mais informação »
The enduring damage of the Supreme Court's transgender rulingConservatives have long criticized federal judges, especially on the Supreme Court, who interpret the Constitution in ways that are convenient for liberal ideology by making huge leaps of logic as to the meaning of the law. Many were shockingly displeased when Republican justices did so in 2020.
Consulte Mais informação »
Durbin announces vote on Supreme Court ethics billThe chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee said the high court is in an “ethical crisis of its own making' after a report that Justice Samuel Alito took an expensive fishing trip with prominent GOP donor Paul Singer.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court justice accepted luxury vacation from GOP donors: reportOne of the donors had interests before the Supreme Court, and Alito did not disclose the trip on his financial disclosure for that year, ProPublica reports.
Consulte Mais informação »