Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post

Brasil Notícia Notícia

Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post
Brasil Últimas Notícias,Brasil Manchetes
  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 72%

The Supreme Court declined to address the legal liability shield that protects tech platforms from being held responsible for their users’ posts, the court said in an unsigned opinion.

The court's decisions in these cases will serve as a big sigh of relief for tech platforms for now, but many members of Congress are still itching to reform the legal liability shield.

"As alleged by plaintiffs, defendants designed virtual platforms and knowingly failed to do 'enough' to remove ISIS-affiliated users and ISIS related content—out of hundreds of millions of users worldwide and an immense ocean of content—from their platforms," Thomas wrote in the court's unanimous opinion.

Many lawmakers see Section 230 as an unnecessary protection for a massive industry, though its proponents say the law also protects smaller players from costly lawsuits, since it helps to dismiss cases about users' speech at an earlier stage. Still, lawmakers remain divided on the form such changes should take, meaning there are still massive hurdles to getting it done.

Resumimos esta notícia para que você possa lê-la rapidamente. Se você se interessou pela notícia, pode ler o texto completo aqui. Consulte Mais informação:

CNBC /  🏆 12. in US

Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes

Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by a government agency more than two decades ago
Consulte Mais informação »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by a government agency more than two decades ago.
Consulte Mais informação »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAt issue are the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristone in 2000, and FDA actions making the drug more accessible in later years.
Consulte Mais informação »

Mifepristone abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtMifepristone abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by the FDA in 2000.
Consulte Mais informação »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAt issue are the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristone in 2000, and FDA actions making the drug more accessible in later years.
Consulte Mais informação »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtLegal arguments over women’s access to a drug used in the most common method of abortion move to a federal appeals court in New Orleans on Wednesday, in a case challenging a Food and Drug Administration decision made more than two decades ago
Consulte Mais informação »



Render Time: 2025-02-27 03:24:34