JUST IN: Supreme Court rules that colleges must stop considering the race of applicants for admission
Blum formed Students for Fair Admissions, which filed the lawsuits against both schools in 2014.
Colleges and universities can use other, race-neutral ways to assemble a diverse student body, including by focusing on socioeconomic status and eliminating the preference for children of alumni and major donors, Students for Fair Admissions argues. The schools contend that they use race in a limited way, but that eliminating it as a factor altogether would make it much harder to achieve a student body that looks like America.
UNC says its freshman class is about 65% white, 22% Asian American, 10% Black and 10% Hispanic. The numbers add to more than 100% because some students report belonging to more than one category, a school spokesman said.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Consulte Mais informação »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court rejects theory that would have meant radical changes to election rulesThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the theory that state legislatures have almost unlimited power to decide the rules for federal elections and draw partisan congressional maps without interference from state courts.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court rules state courts can play role in policing federal electionsBREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan. The case would have left state legislatures virtually unchecked in making rules for federal elections.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court rules against giving state legislatures unchecked control over federal electionsBREAKING: Supreme Court rules against giving state legislatures unchecked control over federal elections, ruling against Republicans in North Carolina fighting for a congressional district map that would heavily favor their candidates.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court rules against Republicans in North Carolina elections disputeThe justices rejected “independent state legislature theory” arguments that would restrict state court power to review certain election laws.
Consulte Mais informação »