The Supreme Court is keeping pandemic-era limits on people seeking asylum in place indefinitely, dashing hopes of immigration advocates who had been anticipating their end this week
FILE - Migrants from Venezuela prepare for relocation to a refugee shelter in Matamoros, Mexico, Friday, Dec. 23, 2022. In a ruling Tuesday, Dec. 27, the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to keep pandemic-era limits on immigration in place indefinitely, dashing hopes of immigration advocates who had been anticipating their end this week.
Immigration advocates sued to end the policy, saying it goes against American and international obligations to people fleeing to the U.S. to escape persecution. They’ve also argued that the policy is outdated as coronavirus treatments improve. Roberts, who handles emergency matters that come from federal courts in the nation’s capital, issued a stay to give the court time to more fully consider both sides’ arguments.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court keeps Title 42 in place while legal challenges play outNineteen Republican-led states had challenged an order by a DC federal court judge that the policy be wound up by Dec. 21. Chief Justice John Roberts initially ordered a stay Dec. 19, leaving the p…
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court keeps immigration limits in place indefinitelyThe Supreme Court is keeping pandemic-era limits on people seeking asylum in place indefinitely, dashing hopes of immigration advocates who had been anticipating their end this week.
Consulte Mais informação »
The case of the Supreme Court that just can't seem to stop talkingThe Supreme Court justices have been known for their discipline when it comes to talking. But as of late, they've been talking, talking, talking ... sometimes more than doubling their allotted time for oral arguments.
Consulte Mais informação »
Title 42: Supreme Court allows Trump-era border policy to remain for nowMigrants have been denied access to the asylum process more than 2.4 million times under the policy.
Consulte Mais informação »
A Year of Dominance and Defiance at the Supreme CourtThis was a year that was split into “before” and “after” the Supreme Court’s decision to overrule Roe v. Wade. “Soul-searching about the Court and the rule of law has rarely been as cynical or as fundamental,” jeanniesgersen writes.
Consulte Mais informação »
The case of the Supreme Court that just can't seem to stop talkingThe Supreme Court justices have been known for their discipline when it comes to talking. But as of late, they've been talking, talking, talking ... sometimes more than doubling their allotted time for oral arguments.
Consulte Mais informação »