For 15 years, the Environmental Protection Agency has blocked Michael and Chantell Sackett from building a home on a vacant lot in a subdivision near Priest Lake, Idaho, declaring that the property is located on a wetland. Now the Supreme Court is wading in.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court opens new term with murky wetlands dispute and Justice Jackson on the benchJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the court, participates in her debut oral argument. The case asks the justices to revisit the scope of the Clean Water Act.
Consulte Mais informação »
Bump stock ban remains as Supreme Court turned away challenge from gun rights advocatesThe Supreme Court has rejected an effort from gun right advocates to challenge the ban on bump stocks, devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire likes machine guns.
Consulte Mais informação »
Here are the Supreme Court's top cases this termThe Supreme Court's new term starts today. Here are 9 cases to watch on major issues including immigration, LGBTQ rights, affirmative action and more.
Consulte Mais informação »
High-stakes Ohio Supreme Court races could influence abortion rights, redistricting in the stateThe balance of the court – which currently has four Republicans and three Democrats – hangs in the balance this election.
Consulte Mais informação »
Opinion | A New Term Begins for This Extremist Right-Wing Supreme Court'It's dangerous for the Supreme Court to rely on power rather than principle. Reasoned decision-making to protect Americans' constitutional rights is central to public trust and judicial legitimacy.'
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court poised to keep marching to right in new termWith public confidence diminished and justices sparring openly over the institution's legitimacy, the Supreme Court on Monday will begin a new term that could push American law to the right on issues of race, voting and the environment. Following June's momentous overturning of nearly 50 years of constitutional protections for abortion rights, the court is diving back in with an aggressive agenda that seems likely to split its six conservative justices from its three liberals. “It’s not going to be a sleepy term,” said Allison Orr Larsen, a William and Mary law professor.
Consulte Mais informação »