Supreme Court asked to hear Thomas Jefferson High School admissions case

Brasil Notícia Notícia

Supreme Court asked to hear Thomas Jefferson High School admissions case
Brasil Últimas Notícias,Brasil Manchetes
  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 64 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 72%

The Coalition for TJ petitioned the Supreme Court to review a case challenging the admissions policy at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology.

University and the University of North Carolinaviolated the constitution, rolling back years of admissions precedent. Some experts said they anticipate seeing more race-neutral policies like those at TJ — which considers factors other than race, like neighborhood or socioeconomic status — as a way to admit diverse classes under the new restrictions. They also expect to see more legal challenges of race-neutral policies.

On Tuesday, a group of organizations around Virginia denounced the petition, saying in a news release that the admissions changes were an important step that “expanded access to the specialized, publicly-funded high school for students from a wider range of economic, racial, and geographic backgrounds in the district.”

of at least 3.5 while taking higher-level courses, as well as complete a problem-solving essay and a “Student Portrait Sheet.”February 2022, U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton ruled that “the purpose of the Board’s admissions overhaul was to change the racial makeup to TJ to the detriment of Asian Americans” and issued an order forbidding Fairfax from using its revised admissions system. Hilton called the policy “patently unconstitutional” and said the decision to implement it was rushed.

took up the case, and ruled in favor of the Coalition for TJ, it would limit the consideration of “race-neutral” factors, making admissions even more colorblind and vastly affect how schools admit diverse classes. Even if the court does not take up the TJ case, she said there would be similar battles to consider in the future.“The big question is: How far do they want to go, and how quickly do they want to get there?” Starr said.

Resumimos esta notícia para que você possa lê-la rapidamente. Se você se interessou pela notícia, pode ler o texto completo aqui. Consulte Mais informação:

washingtonpost /  🏆 95. in US

Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes

Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.

The Supreme Court’s Next Big Tax Case Demands Clarence Thomas’ RecusalThe Supreme Court’s Next Big Tax Case Demands Clarence Thomas’ RecusalThis coming term, the Supreme Court will hear United States v. Moore, a case that could determine the constitutionality of a hypothetical wealth tax.
Consulte Mais informação »

Supreme Court ethics debate divides justices, court watchers, former clerksSupreme Court ethics debate divides justices, court watchers, former clerksImposing a code of ethics on the justices who serve on the Supreme Court is a political idea that — like much of the rest of American politics — has split proponents and opponents down the middle.
Consulte Mais informação »

U.S. Supreme Court asked to hear high school admissions case concerning raceU.S. Supreme Court asked to hear high school admissions case concerning raceA parents group backed by a conservative legal organization asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to consider whether an admissions policy aimed at diversifying an elite Virginia high school is racially discriminatory.
Consulte Mais informação »

Supreme Court asked to hear Virginia high school admissions case concerning raceSupreme Court asked to hear Virginia high school admissions case concerning raceThe case over admissions at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science & Technology comes two months after the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action.
Consulte Mais informação »

Indiana Supreme Court denies rehearing on abortion restrictions clearing way for law to take effectIndiana Supreme Court denies rehearing on abortion restrictions clearing way for law to take effectIn their response to the denial for a rehearing, the Supreme Court ruled as an order with separate opinions, a rehearing is unnecessary.
Consulte Mais informação »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 19:21:06