Supreme Court agrees to hear case that could curb power of federal agencies

Brasil Notícia Notícia

Supreme Court agrees to hear case that could curb power of federal agencies
Brasil Últimas Notícias,Brasil Manchetes
  • 📰 CBSNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 87 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 38%
  • Publisher: 68%

The Supreme Court said Monday that it will take up a dispute between the Biden administration and commercial fishing companies that presents the court with a chance to overrule a nearly 40-year-old decision giving deference to federal agencies.

The Supreme Court said Monday that it will take up a dispute between the Biden administration and commercial fishing companies that presents the court with a chance to overrule a nearly 40-year-old decision giving deference to federal agencies, one which is often criticized by conservatives.

At least two of the justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, have been critical of the Chevron doctrine, and a growing movement of conservatives believe the decision grants agencies too much power and has led to regulatory overreach. Under the law, a fishery management plan may require at least one federal observer to be carried on board domestic fishing vessels when they're at sea. In 2017, the New England Fishery Management Council, one of eight regional councils that advise the secretary on fishery management plans, finalized a proposal to amend the plan for the Atlantic herring fishery to create an industry-funded monitoring program.

A federal district court in Washington sided with the fisheries agency, citing the Chevron doctrine. In its decision, the district court said provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act granted"broad authority" to the National Marine Fisheries Service to create rules necessary to carry out conservation and management measures. The service is a division of the Commerce Department.

The ruling, lawyers for the four companies wrote,"authorizes agencies to force the governed to quarter and pay for their regulatory overseers without clear congressional authorization. And it perceives ambiguity in statutory silence, where the logical explanation for the statutory silence is that Congress did not intend to grant the agency such a dangerous and uncabined authority."

But the Biden administration urged the Supreme Court to leave its 1984 decision intact, writing that though"reasonable minds may disagree" about Chevron's application, it"does not call into question the workability of the framework itself."

Resumimos esta notícia para que você possa lê-la rapidamente. Se você se interessou pela notícia, pode ler o texto completo aqui. Consulte Mais informação:

CBSNews /  🏆 87. in US

Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes

Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.

Disorder in the court: The impact of the Supreme Court Dobbs leak one year onDisorder in the court: The impact of the Supreme Court Dobbs leak one year onThe Supreme Court faced an unprecedented breach of trust one year ago when a leaked draft opinion signaling the overturning of Roe v. Wade was published, an incident that continues to test the institution's foundation of trust and credibility.
Consulte Mais informação »

What to know about Monday's Hunter Biden court hearing in Arkansas | CNN PoliticsWhat to know about Monday's Hunter Biden court hearing in Arkansas | CNN PoliticsHunter Biden is expected to appear in court in northeast Arkansas for a hearing related to a years-old paternity dispute. Here’s a breakdown of the case, and the key players involved.
Consulte Mais informação »

LeRoy Carhart, abortion doctor whose battles reached Supreme Court, dies at 81LeRoy Carhart, abortion doctor whose battles reached Supreme Court, dies at 81LeRoy Carhart, a former Air Force surgeon who later became one of the country’s few specialists in late-term abortions, died at a hospice in Bellevue, Neb. He was 81.
Consulte Mais informação »

Al Gross should have stayed on U.S. House ballot, Alaska Supreme Court saysAl Gross should have stayed on U.S. House ballot, Alaska Supreme Court saysJustices concluded that the Alaska Division of Elections mishandled the withdrawal of the independent who sought to replace Don Young
Consulte Mais informação »

Sam Alito Says Criticism of Supreme Court Is 'Unfair': 'Practically Nobody Is Defending Us'Sam Alito Says Criticism of Supreme Court Is 'Unfair': 'Practically Nobody Is Defending Us''We are being hammered daily, and I think quite unfairly in some of these instances,' the justice complained to the Wall Street Journal amid ethics scandals.
Consulte Mais informação »

Supreme Court’s ability to police itself ‘has already proven to be false’ Elie Mystal saysSupreme Court’s ability to police itself ‘has already proven to be false’ Elie Mystal says“What more does the Supreme Court have to do to prove that it is incapable of policing itself?” ElieNYC urges Congress to create a code of ethics for the Supreme Court after a wave of scandals and ‘ethical catastrophes' over the past year.
Consulte Mais informação »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 02:13:03