From WSJopinion: Don’t believe the cries that the 5-4 decision in Sackett v. EPA will despoil America’s precious wetlands. The majority simply stopped a regulatory land grab.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.Review & OutlookIn Sackett v. EPA, the Justices rebuke the agency for its land grab over ‘waters of the United States.
The Supreme Court issued another landmark decision pruning back an overgrown administrative state on Thursday inDon’t believe the cries that the 5-4 decision will despoil America’s precious wetlands. The majority simply stopped a regulatory land grab.Continue reading your article with
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Supreme Court Reins EPA Power in Sackett Homeowner CaseSupreme Court scaled back the EPA’s power under the Clean Water Act (CWA) by defining the “waters of the United States” in Sackett v. EPA.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court weakens EPA power to enforce Clean Water ActBreaking news: The Supreme Court on Thursday cut back the power of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate the nation’s wetlands and waterways, another setback for the agency’s authority to combat pollution.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court limits EPA's authority over wetlands, boosts property rights over clean waterThe Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police water pollution in a decision that strips protections from wetlands that are isolated from larger bodies of water.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court cuts EPA's Clean Water Act protection for wetlandsThe Supreme Court significantly rolled back federal safeguards for wetlands under the Clean Water Act, siding with Idaho property owners in a decision that curbs EPA power.
Consulte Mais informação »
Supreme Court limits EPA protection for wetlands, ruling for property rights over clean waterIn a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court limits federal protection for wetlands, ruling that marshy areas are usually not covered by the Clean Water Act.
Consulte Mais informação »
How Supreme Court’s EPA ruling will affect U.S. wetlands, clean waterBogs. Marshes. Swamps. Fens. All are examples of wetlands. But the type of wetland that gets protection under federal law is a matter of wide dispute, one reset by a sweeping ruling Thursday from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Consulte Mais informação »