The 2008 F1 title-decider was 'different' to 2021 because it 'wasn't manipulated by anybody'...
Lewis Hamilton doubles down on ‘manipulated’ 2021 title claimLewis Hamilton reiterated his belief that the 2021 title outcome was manipulated as he compared it to the 2008 title conclusion.
Glock asked Hamilton whether he felt there were similarities in reverse to how the 2021 title race concluded, though Hamilton stressed there was a key difference. He believes the 2021 result was “manipulated”, while in 2008 it was not. “No, it was different, it was different because this one wasn’t manipulated by anybody,” said Hamilton. “Someone made a decision for that result to be the way it was basically.
which he was subjected to after that race, which included needing a police escort to the airport, while he and his family have received hateful messages and even death threats. “So I’m sorry that I was very young as you know, so I’m sorry that I wasn’t able to support you in that time. If that was today, I know I could be there to support you. But anyways, you’ve dealt with it amazing.”
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Russell leads Mercedes 1-2 for first F1 win after Hamilton, Verstappen clashGeorge Russell held off Mercedes teammate Lewis Hamilton to claim his first F1 victory in a dramatic Sao Paulo Grand Prix, after 2021 title rivals Hamilton and Max Verstappen came to blows.
Consulte Mais informação »
FIA explain why Max Verstappen was penalised for Lewis Hamilton contactThe FIA stewards have explained why Max Verstappen was 'predominantly at fault' for his clash with Lewis Hamilton at Interlagos on Sunday.
Consulte Mais informação »
Max Verstappen: Lewis Hamilton lacked intention to race, crash cost him victoryMax Verstappen blames Lewis Hamilton for their Interlagos clash, saying the Mercedes driver had no intention of leaving him room to race.
Consulte Mais informação »
Lewis Hamilton after latest Max Verstappen incident: 'You know how it is with Max'After his latest collision with Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton declared that 'you know how it is with Max' after the Sao Paulo GP.
Consulte Mais informação »
The world's biggest esports company is 'consulting legal counsel' over FTX bankruptcyTSM signed a $210 million sponsorship deal with the FTX cryptocurrency exchange last year.
Consulte Mais informação »
Population mental health improves with increasing access to treatment: evidence from a dynamic modelling analysis - BMC PsychiatryBackground Multiple studies indicate that the prevalence of mental disorders in high-income countries has remained stable or increased despite substantial increases in the provision of care, leading some authors to question the effectiveness of increasing access to current treatments as a means of improving population mental health. Methods We developed a system dynamics model of mental disorder incidence and treatment-dependent recovery to assess two potential explanations for the apparent failure of increasing treatment provision to reduce mental disorder prevalence: 1) an increase in the individual-level risk of disorder onset; and 2) declining effectiveness of care resulting from insufficient services capacity growth. Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were used to fit the model to data on the prevalence of high to very high psychological distress in Australia for the period 2008–2019. Results Estimates of yearly rates of increase in the per capita incidence of high to very high psychological distress and the proportion of patients recovering when treated indicate that the individual-level risk of developing high to very high levels of distress increased between 2008 and 2019 (posterior probability | 0.999) but provide no evidence for declining treatment effectiveness. Simulation analyses suggest that the prevalence of high to very high psychological distress would have decreased from 14.4% in 2008 to 13.6% in 2019 if per capita incidence had not increased over this period (prevalence difference 0.0079, 95% credible interval 0.0015–0.0176). Conclusions Our analyses indicate that a modest but significant effect of increasing access to mental health care in Australia between 2008 and 2019 was obscured by a concurrent increase in the incidence of high to very high psychological distress.
Consulte Mais informação »