Some Supreme Court justices wrote unusually sharp critiques of each other's opinions in the decision to overturn affirmative action. See potential bias and similarities in coverage from lawcrimenews, politico and FoxNews: AffirmativeAction SCOTUS
In his concurring opinion, Thomas defended the “colorblind Constitution,” stating, “individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments.” He also said Jackson’s “race-infused world view” used “her broad observations about statistical relationships” to “label all blacks as victims.”Jackson accused the court’s conservative majority of announcing “‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat” with “let-them-eat-cake obliviousness.
” Responding to Thomas, she said his “prolonged attack” demonstrated “an obsession with race consciousness that far outstrips my or UNC’s holistic understanding that race can be a factor that affects applicants’ unique life experiences.” Notably, Jackson capitalized “black,” and Thomas did not.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Justices Who Benefited From Affirmative Action Helped Decide Its FateTwo Supreme Court justices who decided the fate of race-conscious college admissions are themselves among the first products of affirmative action
Consulte Mais informação »
How Supreme Court Justices Sparred on Affirmative ActionThe Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision outlawing affirmative action in higher education produced more than 200 pages of jousting between different camps of justices, a clash that reflects a broader societal debate about racial inequality.
Consulte Mais informação »
Black justices battle over meaning of equality in affirmative action caseJustice Clarence Thomas on Thursday offered a majestic view of America waiting to be unshackled from the evils of racial discrimination that began with slavery, persisted through segregation and most recently manifested in affirmative action.
Consulte Mais informação »
Donald Trump Countersues E Jean CarrollFormer President Donald Trump has filed a countersuit against writer E. Jean Carroll for defamation. See potential biases and similarities in reports from cnn, dcexaminer and bbcworld:
Consulte Mais informação »
WSJ News Exclusive | Big News Publishers Look to Team Up to Address Impact of AISeveral large news and magazine publishers—including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal parent News Corp—are discussing the formation of a new coalition to address the impact of artificial intelligence on the industry
Consulte Mais informação »
Fanatics increases its offer to $225 million to acquire PointsBet's U.S. assetsFanatics outbids DraftKings to acquire the U.S. assets of sports betting site PointsBet.
Consulte Mais informação »