A federal judge sided with Harvard University in a Trump administration-backed challenge to the school's use of race in admissions — the first ruling in a case widely believed to become the Supreme Court’s next opening to ban affirmative action
A federal judge Monday sided with Harvard University in a Trump administration-backed challenge to Harvard's use of race in admissions — the first ruling in a case widely believed to become the Supreme Court’s next opening to ban affirmative action.
However, she added that the "Court will not dismantle a very fine admissions program that passes constitutional muster, solely because it could do better."
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Judge rules in favor of Harvard in affirmative action caseThe judge said in her decision that Harvard's admissions process is 'not perfect' but passes constitutional muster and there is 'no evidence of any racial animus whatsoever.'
Consulte Mais informação »
Federal judge upholds affirmative action at HarvardJUST IN: Federal judge rules Harvard University does not discriminate against Asian Americans in its admissions process, in a case that reignited a national debate over affirmative action.
Consulte Mais informação »
Federal judge upholds affirmative action at HarvardHarvard University does not discriminate against Asian Americans in its admissions process, a federal judge ruled Tuesday in a lawsuit that reignited a national debate over affirmative action. U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs said in her decision v that Harvard&39;s admissions process is "
Consulte Mais informação »
Federal judge upholds affirmative action at HarvardBOSTON (AP) — Harvard University does not discriminate against Asian Americans in its admissions process, a federal judge ruled Tuesday in a lawsuit that reignited a national debate over...
Consulte Mais informação »
Judge Dismisses States’ Challenge to Trump Tax OverhaulA judge said the states failed to show that disproportionate economic effects of a cap on the federal income tax deduction for state and local taxes were different than other matters that shape state taxation policies.
Consulte Mais informação »