The Trump-appointed judge wrote that CNN’s statements, while “repugnant,” were not defamatory.
In the lawsuit, Donald Trump’s team argued that CNN writers and television anchors’ use of the phrase the “Big Lie,” in five specific incidents, incited “readers and viewers to hate, contempt, distrust, ridicule, and even fear” him.
“Being ‘Hitler-like’ is not a verifiable statement of fact that would support a defamation claim,” Singhal wrote in his dismissal. “CNN’s statements while repugnant, were not, as a matter of law, defamatory.”
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Judge Dismisses Donald Trump’s “Big Lie” Defamation Lawsuit Against CNNA federal judge dismissed Donald Trump’s $475 million defamation lawsuit against CNN, litigation centered on references made by on-air figures to “the Big Lie,” or the former president’…
Consulte Mais informação »
Jen Psaki: The many real victims of Trump's 'big lie'Plus a constitutional amendment battle brewing in Ohio and a journalist following the Trump special counsel's final moves in this week’s 3 Minute Read from Jen Psaki.
Consulte Mais informação »
Buffs bolt for Big 12: Colorado will exit Pac-12, rejoin Big 12 in 2024Ralphie is running to the Big 12! 🦬 The University of Colorado's board of regents unanimously voted Thursday to leave the Pac-12 conference and join the new-look Big 12 next year. cubuffs
Consulte Mais informação »
Eagles crystal ball: Big season for DeVonta Smith, big surprise at running back, big questions for DBs | David MurphyDaily News | Eagles crystal ball: Big season for DeVonta Smith, big surprise at RB, big questions for DBs
Consulte Mais informação »
Saquon Barkley still disappointed after following ‘heart’ back to Giants: ‘Flat-out lie’Barkley and the Giants agreed to a one-year deal Monday after missing the deadline to firm up a long-term agreement.
Consulte Mais informação »