The Illinois Supreme Court is set to announce its decision surrounding the state’s controversial “SAFE-T Act” Tuesday, a pivotal moment for the legislation, which would eliminate the use of cash bail.
in the state Constitution that requires defendants be bailable “by sufficient sureties,” except for certain offenses. He also found that it violated the separation of powers between the judiciary and Legislature.
Opponents to the law argue lawmakers violated the state’s constitution when they failed to seek approval from voters through a constitutional amendment, and they say they would “strongly support” such a system if the state had done so. “Plaintiffs’ grab-bag of constitutional theories should be rejected: None of these constitutional provisions locks in place the institution of monetary bail,” the motion contends.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Illinois Supreme Court expected to rule on elimination of cash bail TuesdayThe Illinois Supreme Cour expects to issue a ruling Tuesday deciding whether cashless bail for criminal defendants will be implemented in the state.
Consulte Mais informação »
U.S. Supreme Court ends efforts to right wrongs of the 1890 Mississippi ConstitutionFor decades, federal courts stepped in to right the racist wrongs of Mississippi’s 1890 Constitution. That legacy did not continue in a recent felony suffrage case.
Consulte Mais informação »
2 big takeaways from the Supreme Court ruling on Biden's student loan forgiveness planConservative Supreme Court justices found that Biden’s plan would hurt Missouri’s finances, and that the president didn’t have the power to cancel so much debt.
Consulte Mais informação »
Here and Now: Impact of the Supreme Court's decision on affirmative actionOn this episode of Here and Now, we take a look at how the striking down of affirmative action will impact students of color.
Consulte Mais informação »
Is the Media Finally Waking Up to a New Kind of Supreme Court Coverage?Judicial coverage has long sidestepped the politicking that goes on in and around the Supreme Court. Post-Dobbs leak, and amid mounting ethics concerns, that may be changing. “It needs to be covered in a more comprehensive way,” a legal affairs reporter says.
Consulte Mais informação »
Vivek Ramaswamy releases conservative pool of Supreme Court picksBorrowing a page from former President Donald Trump, the 2024 GOP hopeful is assuring primary voters that he would keep the bench weighted toward the right.
Consulte Mais informação »