The House Judiciary Committee is “seriously weighing' issuing subpoenas for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and two prosecutors who resigned last year from his team to testify before the panel following the unprecedented indictment of former President Trump, a source familiar told Fox News Digital.
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, discusses the indictment and prosecution of former President Trump and the Biden family's business dealings with China.
Since last week, days before the unprecedented indictment and arrest of a former President of the United States, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer began demanding answers from Bragg and his office – suggesting he testify before Congress.
After Pomerantz resigned, he wrote a tell-all book based on the investigation, which was still ongoing. The book seemingly made the case to charge Trump. Before joining the Manhattan District Attorney's office, Pomerantz was of counsel at New York law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. He took leave from the firm last year to join Vance’s office to investigate Trump’s financial dealings.
The indictment was unsealed in court during Trump's arraignment Tuesday before presiding trial Judge Juan Merchan. Trump was charged in a New York Supreme Court indictment with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The former President of the United States, who is currently the 2024 Republican presidential front-runner, faces a maximum sentence of 136 years in prison if convicted.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
Donald Trump arrest: Trump and Alvin Bragg are what we deserveThe indictment of former President Donald Trump and accompanying statements by New York prosecutor Alvin Bragg tell two stories of America’s decline.
Consulte Mais informação »
Donald Trump arrest: Bragg pushes for 'protective order' but no gag on TrumpManhattan prosecutors asked a judge presiding over former President Donald Trump's hush money case to impose a 'protective order' that would prevent the former president from posting case documents to social media as the judge signaled there would be no gag order in the case.
Consulte Mais informação »
Bragg’s case against Trump hits a wall of skepticism — even from Trump’s criticsBragg’s case against Trump is running into a wall of skepticism — including from left-leaning legal experts, liberal pundits and even some of Trump’s Republican detractors who have otherwise been eager to see him held accountable.
Consulte Mais informação »
Trump Frantically Calls For Bragg to 'Indict Himself' on Eve of ArraignmentWhile Trump rages at the approaching arraignment, he and his team have worked to twist the courthouse spectacle in their favor
Consulte Mais informação »