The imbalanced list raised many questions over how the rankings were actually decided.
on the publication's website. Acknowledging the Twitter furore, Lane wrote: ”The core social message—thateditors picked 100 innovative leaders, while including only one woman—would anger me too.
“ He went on to describe the decision-making in further detail, before diving into the broader industry problems that fed into the misstep: “Women, as we all know, are poorly represented at the top of the largest corporations and fare even worse among growing public tech companies. In other words, for all our carefully-calibrated methodology, women never had much of a chance here.
Brasil Últimas Notícias, Brasil Manchetes
Similar News:Você também pode ler notícias semelhantes a esta que coletamos de outras fontes de notícias.
A man in Florida spent $50,000 at Costco on 100 generators and supplies for the Bahamas"It&39;s important that we help each other out," the man told CNN. "It&39;s better than just sitting there. You see a need and you fill it."
Consulte Mais informação »
Dave Chappelle's Netflix special is offending critics, but viewers don't careWhile the critics may not have cared for 'Sticks and Stones,' viewers gave it a 99% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes.
Consulte Mais informação »
‘The neoliberal takeover of the human body’ — this highly invasive technology could make your credit cards obsolete‘Biometric wallets’ will remove the last physical barrier between our bodies and corporate America.
Consulte Mais informação »